Hi Daniel,
Following network capture about this error
Establishing dialog :
U 192.168.1.15:22490 -> 192.168.238.66:5060
INVITE sip:mike@193.41.238.66 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.15:22490;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-ac504a4dec29b725-1--d87543-;rport..Max-Forwards:
70..Contact: <sip:guest@192.168.1.15:22490>..To: "mike"<sip
:mike@193.41.238.66>..From:
"guest"<sip:guest@193.41.238.66>;tag=da5f1d51..Call-ID:
MGU1ZjI4NTVlN2QwMzkwNTE5NjAwNDAzZmQzYzkyYTU...CSeq: 1 INVITE..Allow:
INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, ME
SSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO..Content-Type: application/sdp..User-Agent: X-Lite
release 1006e stamp 34025..Content-Length: 325....v=0..o=- 0 2 IN IP4
192.168.1.15..s=CounterPath X-Lite 3.0..c=IN IP4 192.168.1.15
..t=0 0..m=audio 59868 RTP/AVP 107 119 0 98 8 3 101..a=alt:1 1 : 8QG5saMW
GpfUnnJ2 192.168.1.15 59868..a=fmtp:101 0-15..a=rtpmap:107
BV32/16000..a=rtpmap:119 BV32-FEC/16000..a=rtpmap:98 iLBC/8000..a=rtpmap
:101 telephone-event/8000..a=sendrecv..
U 192.168.238.66:5060 -> 192.168.1.82:11126
INVITE sip:mike@192.168.1.82:11126;rinstance=927a1ec90c2eaae1
SIP/2.0..Record-Route:
<sip:193.41.238.66;lr=on;did=362.c4448611;nat=yes>..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
193.41.238.66;branch=z9hG4bK7922.1834b4a3.0..Via: S
IP/2.0/UDP
193.41.238.91;branch=z9hG4bKsr-jeHVIbuBclW510R2cqTnIEiOglD9IEiZgEun6MTGgZ1u-v1KdEzSpo0B.O2W8EHy1b1SfnZTgMpZ6Mcz.q.G.bpOcEuGxqun6b2Ggle9IfZTgMpZ6MczgkYGtkYe-qun6MTG..Max-Forwards:
69..Contact: <s
ip:193.41.238.91;line=sr-pOHGgodZxh6eVMircSD96E2BcfD96qyncEVrcR**>..To:
"mike"<sip:mike@193.41.238.66>..From:
"guest"<sip:guest@193.41.238.66>;tag=da5f1d51..Call-ID:
LongPhone@qjd5c5Kmfq1g50x4qEY1deZCLkdg5
ijZqoKwderiVhKLt50CvhKP85Hj5fD*..CSeq: 2 INVITE..Allow: INVITE, ACK,
CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE,
INFO..Content-Type: application/sdp..User-Agent: X-Lite release 1006e stamp
340
25..Content-Length: 345..Session-Expires: 90....v=0..o=- 0 2 IN IP4
193.41.238.66..s=CounterPath X-Lite 3.0..c=IN IP4 193.41.238.66..t=0
0..m=audio 46488 RTP/AVP 107 119 0 98 8 3 101..a=alt:1 1 : 8QG5saMW
GpfUnnJ2 192.168.1.15 59868..a=fmtp:101 0-15..a=rtpmap:107
BV32/16000..a=rtpmap:119 BV32-FEC/16000..a=rtpmap:98
iLBC/8000..a=rtpmap:101
telephone-event/8000..a=sendrecv..a=nortpproxy:yes..
[...]
dlg_end_dlg used in this case :
U 192.168.238.66:5060 -> 192.168.1.15:22490
BYE sip:guest@192.168.1.15:22490 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
193.41.238.66;branch=z9hG4bK8922.3152a2a4.0..To:
sip:guest@193.41.238.66;tag=da5f1d51..From:
sip:mike@193.41.238.66;tag=99700f27..CSeq: 3 BYE..Cal
l-ID: MGU1ZjI4NTVlN2QwMzkwNTE5NjAwNDAzZmQzYzkyYTU...Content-Length:
0..User-Agent: kamailio (3.1.4 (x86_64/linux))..Max-Forwards: 70....
U 192.168.238.66:5060 -> 192.168.1.82:11126
BYE sip:mike@192.168.1.82:11126;rinstance=927a1ec90c2eaae1 SIP/2.0..Via:
SIP/2.0/UDP 193.41.238.66;branch=z9hG4bK8922.4152a2a4.0..To:
sip:mike@193.41.238.66;tag=99700f27..From: sip:guest@193.41.238.66;tag=
da5f1d51..CSeq: 3 BYE..Call-ID:
MGU1ZjI4NTVlN2QwMzkwNTE5NjAwNDAzZmQzYzkyYTU...Content-Length:
0..User-Agent: kamailio (3.1.4 (x86_64/linux))..Max-Forwards: 70....
U 192.168.1.15:22490 -> 192.168.238.66:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
193.41.238.66;branch=z9hG4bK8922.3152a2a4.0..Contact:
<sip:guest@192.168.1.15:22490>..To:
<sip:guest@193.41.238.66>;tag=da5f1d51..From:
<sip:mike@193.41.238.66>;tag=99700f2
7..Call-ID: MGU1ZjI4NTVlN2QwMzkwNTE5NjAwNDAzZmQzYzkyYTU...CSeq: 3
BYE..User-Agent: X-Lite release 1006e stamp 34025..Content-Length: 0....
U 192.168.1.82:11126 -> 192.168.238.66:5060
SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
193.41.238.66;branch=z9hG4bK8922.4152a2a4.0..To:
<sip:mike@193.41.238.66>;tag=99700f27..From:
<sip:guest@193.41.238.66>;tag=da5f1d51..Call-ID:
MGU1ZjI4NTVlN2QwMzkwNTE5NjAwNDAzZmQzYzkyYTU...CSeq: 3 BYE..Accept-Language:
en..Content-Length: 0....
I wish that it can help you to troble shoot this problem.
Best regards,
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:11:45 +0200, Richard DEMONGEOT
<rich...@demongeot.biz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:43:34 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> <mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 8/5/11 9:56 AM, Richard DEMONGEOT wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I've encountered two issues with Sip Router.
>>>
>>> Build : Kamailio 3.1.4 for Squeeze (Kamailio's debian Packages).
>>>
>>> When i'm using Topoh with Call-ID encoding, instruction dlg_bye("ALL")
>>> generate me an error on logfiles :
>>>
>>> Aug 4 17:46:26 kamtest /usr/sbin/kamailio[25267]: ERROR: topoh
>>> [th_mask.c:166]: invalid input
>>> string"dd04db6ccc7074deb9f8a1160946d331@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0"
>>> Aug 4 17:46:26 kamtest /usr/sbin/kamailio[25267]: ERROR: topoh
>>> [th_msg.c:480]: cannot decode callid
>>> Aug 4 17:46:26 kamtest /usr/sbin/kamailio[25268]: ERROR: topoh
>>> [th_mask.c:166]: invalid input
>>> string"dd04db6ccc7074deb9f8a1160946d331@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0"
>>> Aug 4 17:46:26 kamtest /usr/sbin/kamailio[25268]: ERROR: topoh
>>> [th_msg.c:480]: cannot decode callid
>>>
>>> Only "INCOMING LEG" is ended, and "OUTGOING LEG", with call-ID encoded
>>> continue.
>>>
>>> Have you any idea about this problem?
>>>
>>> Can we use dlg_bye("ALL") with call-id encoding?
>> I have to analyze a bit, encoding call-id might not be compatible with
>> dlg_bye(). Can you capture the SIP traffic with ngrep for such call and
>> send it over? It will help to troubleshoot without setting a testbed for
>> it.
>
> I can't take a capture before Monday. However, as i've take some capture
> when i've tried to troubleshoot this problem, i've seen that only caller
> recieve a BYE from proxy.
>
> I'll give you a network capture monday.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
