Alex Hermann writes: > 1) set onreply_route to A > 2) relay 1st branch > 3) 1st branch times out, internal 408 is created > 4) tm send CANCEL to 1st branch > > 5) in failure route, onreply_route is set to B > 6) relay 2nd branch > 7) 1st branch responds with 487, and goes into reply_route B instead of A > > I think each branch should take the reply_route which was set before it got > relayed and not pick up later changes meant for other branches.
if first branch already timed out, shouldn't reply in step(7) go to garbage pin instead? -- juha _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
