That's a very unclear/ambiguous description for those flags ... -ovidiu
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at> wrote: > Hi Juha! > > Maybe the description is bad/wrong, but the details are described in this > thread: > > http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2012-February/071943.html > > regards > Klaus > > > On 17.10.2012 18:47, Juha Heinanen wrote: >> >> i'm new to rtpproxy (have been using mediaproxy for years) and now try >> to understand if it would make sense to switch over. rtpproxy readme >> has this on flags value 1: >> >> + 1 - append first Via branch to Call-ID when sending command to >> rtpproxy. >> ... >> This is especially useful if you have serially forked call >> scenarios where rtpproxy gets an "update" command for a new >> branch, and then a "delete" command for the previous branch, >> which would otherwise delete the full call, breaking the >> subsequent "lookup" for the new branch. >> >> how it would be possible in SERIAL forked scenario to get anything for a >> new branch before previous branch has first failed and gone? >> >> -- juha _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
