Hello,
what value you have for failure_reply_mode parameter of tm?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/14/12 3:12 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
I am using the latest pull of branch 3.3, and t_branch_timeout()
doesn't work if the previous branch resulted in a reply (i.e. a
negative final reply).
That is to say, t_branch_timeout() == FALSE on a genuine timeout, as
long as the preceding branch provided a result (such as 404).
t_branch_timeout() == TRUE if this is a timeout, on the first branch.
In other words, it appears that if t_any_replied() == TRUE, then
t_branch_timeout() == FALSE, even for this branch, and even if the
branch really did time out (no response at all from destination).
That's not how the documentation says it should behave. Am I doing
something wrong? If so, how do I find out if _this particular_ branch
timed out, from the failure_route[]?
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
