Hi guys,
was this issue resolved?
I encountered this issue also (4.0.5), in failure_route, i used
t_reply("404","not found")
never sent out, instead i get this in logs,
WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1564]: t_unref(): WARNING: script writer didn't
release transaction
Kelvin Chua
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the backtrace is ok for the moment. I will look over it and come back with
> results.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 11/25/13 12:10 PM, Efelin Novak wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> sorry it took me more than I expected. Is this sufficient? Meanwhile I
> found out that this happens when fr_inv_timer triggers and dialog module is
> turned on.
>
> Backtrace:
>
> bt
> #0 futex_release (lock=0xb4b90798) at ../../mem/../futexlock.h:137
> #1 next_state_dlg (dlg=dlg@entry=0xb4bc5a38, event=event@entry=4,
> old_state=old_state@entry=0xbfef08a0, new_state=new_state@entry=0xbfef089c,
> unref=unref@entry=0xbfef08a4) at dlg_hash.c:950
> #2 0xb6b05479 in dlg_onreply (t=0xb4bc5ce8, type=1048576,
> param=0xbfef097c) at dlg_handlers.c:469
> #3 0xb6cc2336 in run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0xb4bc5d28,
> type=type@entry=1048576, trans=0xb4bc5ce8, params=params@entry=0xbfef097c)
> at t_hooks.c:290
> #4 0xb6cc25da in run_trans_callbacks_with_buf (type=type@entry=1048576,
> rbuf=rbuf@entry=0xb4bc5d54, req=req@entry=0xb4bc6a08,
> repl=repl@entry=0xffffffff,
> flags=flags@entry=505) at t_hooks.c:336
> #5 0xb6cee953 in _reply_light (trans=trans@entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
> buf=0xb731f588 "SIP/2.0 505 Error\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.21.4;branch=z9hG4bKa6f5.8ca73657.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 10.0.0.95;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKBc143aFe81jDj\r\nFrom: \"USER\" <
> sip:USER@10.0.0.95>;t"..., len=len@entry=434, code=code@entry=505,
> lock=0, bm=0xbfef0e48, to_tag_len=<error reading variable: Unhandled dwarf
> expression opcode 0xfa>,
> to_tag=<error reading variable: Unhandled dwarf expression opcode
> 0xfa>) at t_reply.c:628
> #6 0xb6ceedeb in _reply (trans=0xb4bc5ce8, trans@entry=0x1f9,
> p_msg=p_msg@entry=0xb731f568, code=505, text=0xb731f568 "Error", lock=0)
> at t_reply.c:782
> #7 0xb6ceefd7 in t_reply_unsafe (t=0x1f9, t@entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
> p_msg=0xb731f568, p_msg@entry=0xb6d196c0, code=0, text=text@entry=0xb731f568
> "Error") at t_reply.c:1531
> #8 0xb6cd6904 in w_t_reply (msg=0xb6d196c0, p1=0xb731c988 "8]0\267\001",
> p2=0xb731c9b8 "8P0\267 ") at tm.c:1283
> #9 0x080651cf in do_action (h=h@entry=0xbfef1258, a=a@entry=0xb7305d98,
> msg=msg@entry=0xb6d196c0) at action.c:1080
> #10 0x08064137 in run_actions (h=h@entry=0xbfef1258, a=a@entry=0xb73053c8,
> msg=msg@entry=0xb6d196c0) at action.c:1573
> #11 0x0806cedd in run_top_route (a=0xb73053c8, msg=msg@entry=0xb6d196c0,
> c=c@entry=0x0) at action.c:1658
> #12 0xb6ceba98 in run_failure_handlers (t=t@entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
> rpl=0xffffffff, code=408, extra_flags=96) at t_reply.c:1028
> #13 0xb6cece22 in t_should_relay_response (Trans=Trans@entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
> new_code=new_code@entry=408, branch=branch@entry=0,
> should_store=should_store@entry=0xbfef1464,
> should_relay=should_relay@entry=0xbfef1460,
> cancel_data=cancel_data@entry=0xbfef1510, reply=reply@entry=0xffffffff)
> at t_reply.c:1304
> #14 0xb6cef076 in relay_reply (t=t@entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
> p_msg=p_msg@entry=0xffffffff,
> branch=branch@entry=0, msg_status=msg_status@entry=408,
> cancel_data=cancel_data@entry=0xbfef1510,
> do_put_on_wait=do_put_on_wait@entry=0) at t_reply.c:1707
> #15 0xb6cc28b4 in fake_reply (t=t@entry=0xb4bc5ce8, branch=0,
> code=code@entry=408) at timer.c:354
> #16 0xb6cc34b0 in final_response_handler (t=0xb4bc5ce8, r_buf=0xb4bc5dc8)
> at timer.c:526
> #17 retr_buf_handler (ticks=272914717, tl=0xb4bc5ddc, p=0x3e8) at
> timer.c:584
> #18 0x08183325 in timer_list_expire (slow_mark=12, slow_l=0xb49f2438,
> h=0xb49f2338, t=272914717) at timer.c:894
> #19 timer_handler () at timer.c:959
> #20 timer_main () at timer.c:998
> #21 0x080b8c65 in main_loop () at main.c:1709
> #22 0x08063bfe in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfef1844) at main.c:2566
>
> (I have changed USER and IP address to hide my network :))
>
> After this when I hit 'n' multiple times I got following output in
> infinite loop:
>
> 22 0x08063bfe in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfef1844) at main.c:2566
> (gdb) n
> next_state_dlg (dlg=dlg@entry=0xb4bc5a38, event=event@entry=4,
> old_state=old_state@entry=0xbfef08a0, new_state=new_state@entry=0xbfef089c,
> unref=unref@entry=0xbfef08a4) at dlg_hash.c:952
> 952 LM_DBG("dialog %p changed from state %d to "
> (gdb)
> 955 }
> (gdb)
> dlg_onreply (t=0xb4bc5ce8, type=1048576, param=0xbfef097c) at
> dlg_handlers.c:470
> 470 dlg_run_event_route(dlg, (rpl==FAKED_REPLY)?NULL:rpl,
> old_state, new_state);
> (gdb)
> 472 if (new_state==DLG_STATE_EARLY) {
> (gdb)
> 479 if (new_state==DLG_STATE_CONFIRMED_NA &&
> (gdb)
> 540 if ( new_state==DLG_STATE_DELETED
> (gdb)
> 542 || old_state==DLG_STATE_EARLY) ) {
> (gdb)
> 541 && (old_state==DLG_STATE_UNCONFIRMED
> (gdb)
> 559 if (unref) dlg_unref(dlg, unref);
> (gdb)
> 563 dlg_release(dlg);
> (gdb)
> 565 }
> (gdb)
> run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0xb4bc5d28, type=type@entry=1048576,
> trans=0xb4bc5ce8, params=params@entry=0xbfef097c) at t_hooks.c:292
> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
> (gdb)
> 283 while(cbp){
> (gdb)
> 286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
> (gdb)
> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
> (gdb)
> 283 while(cbp){
> (gdb)
> 286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
> (gdb)
> 287 DBG("DBG: trans=%p, callback type %d, id %d entered\n",
> (gdb)
> 290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
> (gdb)
> 289 params->param = &(cbp->param);
> (gdb)
> 290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
> (gdb)
> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
> (gdb)
> 283 while(cbp){
> (gdb)
> 286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
> (gdb)
> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
> (gdb)
> 283 while(cbp){
> (gdb)
> 286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
> (gdb)
> 287 DBG("DBG: trans=%p, callback type %d, id %d entered\n",
> (gdb)
> 290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
> (gdb)
> 289 params->param = &(cbp->param);
> (gdb)
> 290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
> (gdb)
> 292 cbp=cbp->next;
> (gdb)
> 283 while(cbp){
>
> Regards
>
> Efelin
>
>
> 2013/11/20 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I will investigate more -- meanwhile had some traveling. It would speed
>> up if you can send the backtrace of one process that blocks when you
>> applied the patch.
>>
>> You need to connect with gdb to it:
>>
>> gdb /path/to/kamailio _PID_
>>
>> replace _PID_ with the pid of blocked kamailio process.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 11/15/13 5:50 PM, Efelin Novak wrote:
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> thanks for a reply. I applied the patch and now the Kamailio just prints
>>
>> WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1564]: t_unref(): WARNING: script writer didn't
>> release transaction
>>
>> and than freezes without any log. It does not resend the incoming
>> "winning" failure reply neither response to any other messages, not even to
>> a new calls. It just freezes. All kamailio processes are running and eating
>> the whole 4-core processor.
>>
>> Restart of Kamailio solves this problem.
>>
>> Any ideas how to continue with debug?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Efelin
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/15 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> can you try attached patch?
>>>
>>> Let me know if all goes fine and I will commit it to the repository.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/15/13 10:25 AM, Efelin Novak wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> when I use t_reply("505", "Error"); in my failure route, the response
>>> is not forwarded and following is written into a log:
>>>
>>> kamailio[26216]: WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1559]: t_unref(): WARNING:
>>> script writer didn't release transaction
>>>
>>> plus next line is written exactly 416000 times into a log afterwards:
>>>
>>> kamailio[32685]: CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:794]:
>>> log_next_state_dlg(): bogus event 4 in state 5 for dlg 0xb4af6588
>>> [2575:7017] with clid '121d44f0-6555f4c8' and tags 'd12546d053aadc68o2' ''
>>>
>>> My point is to change the incoming code from users and append a Q.850
>>> reason code.
>>> Is there any other way how to do this or a way how to fix this?
>>> I'm using Kamilio 4.0.4 on Debian 7.1
>>>
>>>
>>> The code is as follows:
>>> failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE]
>>> {
>>> if (t_is_canceled()) {
>>> exit;
>>> }
>>> if($T_reply_code == 408 && isflagset(10))
>>> {
>>> xlog("Ringing timeout");
>>> append_to_reply("Reason: Q.850;cause=28\r\n");
>>> t_reply("505", "Error");
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>>> listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
>>> http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
>>> - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
>> http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
>> - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda
> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
