Hi Shankar, What version of Kamailio are you running? Kamailio -V
Cheers Jason On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Shankar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > > > Please find below my response inline, > > > > > > I have some questions for you as we have used suspend/continue quite a lot > in the IMS code and don't have any leaks. > > > > Firstly, why are you using pkg_mem for your hash_id and label? Remember > that you will be in 2 different processes in the suspend and continue > portions of the code... so pkg_mem will not work - you should use shm_mem > instead. > > > > [Shankar] We use pkg_mem because we are invoking t_continue from the same > process ( using thread ). > > > > Secondly, how are you using top to tell that you have a leak? Kamailio's > memory is internally managed. > > > > [Shankar] After running for say 20minutes, we get out of shared memory > error. Also in top output we observed incremental increase in the shared > usage of shared memory for the process. > > > > Cheers > > Jason > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Shankar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Re-sending without the attachment. > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Shankar [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> > ] > > > *Sent:* Monday, January 13, 2014 4:57 PM > > > *To:* '[email protected]' > > > *Subject:* Regd. t_suspend() and t_continue() > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > We are trying out the t_suspend() and t_continue() in our test setup. > > > We are facing memory leak ( both shm and pkg as per top command results). > > > > > > > > > > > > Please find below the scenario, > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Do a t_newtran() > > > > > > 2) Allocate pkg memory for hashid and label. > > > > > > 3) Call t_suspend() > > > > > > 4) Do t_continue() when async result is available > > > > > > 5) De-allocate pkg memory reserved for hashid and label > > > > > > 6) Do a t_relay() which forwards the sip message to another sip > node. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the step (6) above, we see t_newtran() allocates one more time > > > shared memory for the same transaction. > > > > > > > > > > > > We tried t_release() after step (4) to release the transaction as > > > t_relay() anyways allocates new shared memory. Nothing helped. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know what are the logs you would require to debug the same. > > > I am attaching syslog for this run. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Shankar > > > -- *Jason Penton**Senior Manager: Applications and Services**Smile Communications Pty (Ltd)**Mobile:*+27 (0) 83 283 7000*Skype:* [email protected] <[email protected]> www.smilecoms.com This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
