This feature (increasing/decreasing cseq for calls authenticated to the
next hop by kamailio) is available with 4.2.0, by using dialog and uac
modules.

See more details at:
  -
http://by-miconda.blogspot.de/2014/10/kamailio-42-tips-7-increment-cseq-for.html

Let me know if works ok for you, as I did not test it yet extensively.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 30/10/14 16:11, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
> As I understand UAC module can not be used at production as module
> foroutgoing calls from kamailio to provider with this limitations?
>
> 2014-10-30 18:24 GMT+04:00 Pavel Eremin <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>
>     No way. Use sems or b2b.
>
>     30.10.2014 19:59 пользователь "Yuriy Gorlichenko"
>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> написал:
>
>         Does it possible increase cSeq manually (for example remove
>          and then append headers?) for UAC module when send INVITE
>         messages with Auth, or kamailio have pseudovar for this header?
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
>         mailing list
>         [email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>         http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>     list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to