Hi,

I suppose calling set_forward_no_connect() at the LB for a request from the registrar to a user will lead to the result. LB won't try to make an outgoing tcp/tls connection to reach a requested destination and will only forward a request only via existing one.

BR

Thanks for your explanation, the problem is that the actual lookup is done by a proxy which is located after our load balancer. Therefore, the TCP connection with the UA should not be visible by the proxy but by the load balancer.

How does that work in such case?

*From:*sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Vitaliy Aleksandrov
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:34 AM
*To:* sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

*set_forward_no_connect()* called after lookup() prevents kamailio from making a new connection to a phone if there is no active connection. This is useful when you are trying to call to a UA which kamailio still keeps registration record for, but TCP/TLS connect to this phone is already gone (due to timeout, network problem, etc...).

On 05/05/15 14:54, Mickael Marrache wrote:

    In general, it happens in our network (as more and more Via
    headers are added).

    Sorry, I didn't understand your last sentence. What do you mean by
    not connect if there is no active connection after location lookup?

    *From:*sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On
    Behalf Of *Daniel-Constantin Mierla
    *Sent:* Monday, May 04, 2015 11:07 PM
    *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
    *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

    Hello,

    where are typically those issues with truncated SDP? On the phones?

    If you use tcp and have phones behind the nat, it is recommended
    to not connect if there is no active connection after location
    lookup -- see core functions for tcp.

    Cheers,
    Daniel

    On 04/05/15 13:54, Mickael Marrache wrote:

        Hi,

        We sometimes get issues caused by truncated SDP bodies.
        Therefore, we are looking at using TCP instead of UDP.

        What is the recommended configuration when TCP is used?

        Currently, I only have the following:

        children=16

        listen=udp:<ip>:5060

        listen=tcp:<ip>:5060

        disable_tcp=no

        tcp_connection_lifetime=605 (registration expiry is 600)

        Also, is there a difference with UDP regarding NAT handling?

        Thanks,

        Mickael





        _______________________________________________

        SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list

        sr-users@lists.sip-router.org  <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>

        http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users




--
    Daniel-Constantin Mierla

    http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>  
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

    Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015

    Berlin, Germany -http://www.kamailioworld.com




    _______________________________________________

    SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list

    sr-users@lists.sip-router.org  <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>

    http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users



_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to