Ali Taher writes: > Yes I know , I gave 192.168.26.4 smaller priority , then 192.168.26.1 then > 192.168.26.6. > So in this way gateways must be ordered as 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 , > 192.168.26.6. > Yet I got them ordered as 192.168.26.6, 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 , > 192.168.26.6. > If as you're saying it's sorting issue , then why I got 192.168.26.6 gateway > twice (at the first and at the end).
as i mentioned, it is not possible to say anything based on the above information. you need to check your lcr tables, especially lcr_rule_target table. -- juha _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
