Hi Daniel,
There is nothing in $rU for this appearing in Kamailio. That is same
according to the Packet capture there is not $rU in my INVITE coming from
FS.
This is where in kamailio.cfg I'm getting a 484 Address Incomplete from
Kamailio back to FS.
if (!is_method("REGISTER") && $rU==$null) {
# request with no Username in RURI
sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete");
exit;
}
So Like I mentioned, if only the $rU part is maintained in the Contact
header by TOPOH this would start working as I've experimented by disabling
TOPOH and repeated the scenario and it worked.
Thanks for looking into this,
Regards,
Sammy
On Feb 17, 2016 08:31, "Igor Olhovskiy" <igorolhovs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just a quick question, if possible.
> I can’t get $ru in reply, cause in reply_route it gives me $ru from
> original INVITE. In OpenSIPS I’m using $(<reply>hdr(contact)), but how to
> do this on Kamailio?
> Anyway, contact Header from reply was got from tcpdump capture on Kamailio
> server.
>
> 2016-02-17 10:06 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> isn't the username then decoded from the value of
>>
>>
>> sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My**
>>
>> In other words, when the follow up invite in Kamailio comes, can you
>> print the value of $ru with xlog and see if it has username?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 16/02/16 22:54, Igor Olhovskiy wrote:
>>
>> Yep, got same problem.
>> Not sure it’s a bug, but seems to be topoh module is really lack some
>> configuration.
>>
>> 2016-02-12 21:13 GMT+02:00 SamyGo <govoi...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> I've recently stumbled upon this little hitch while using kamailio with
>>> topoh module that the Contact header do not contains the User part for the
>>> 302 Moved temporarily packet.
>>>
>>> *My topology:*
>>> UserA<====\
>>> ->Kamailio<===>FreeSwitch
>>> UserB<====/
>>>
>>> The B party has set Call forwarding on their phone hence phone sends a
>>> 302 Moved Temporarily to Kamailio.
>>>
>>>
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>> TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0767.4e4e57deca89da5c5f5ae97228325f85.0
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>> TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP;branch=z9hG4bKsr-j4IPOlV7MGQKatycM.y7MGZLMGZwM.1LgRWIC9gIgx4fMGZAOBVAOBNfzuaVHRaYpB1LNSQLpx4uMx3Az6eL3RsBCxu-zRrUWSeOgjeBk.IVm4ds34aONc**
>>> From: "+4319714111" <sip:+4319714111
>>> @FREESWITCH.IP.HERE>;tag=yUr5UZ7eF794K
>>> To: <sip:5...@user.b.ip.here:5060>;tag=105223296
>>> Call-ID: cd811276-4b4d-1234-66ae-005056867dbc
>>> CSeq: 87257355 INVITE
>>> Contact: <sip:06606017...@freeswitch.ip.here:5060>
>>> User-Agent: Yealink SIP-T46G 28.80.0.70
>>> Diversion: <sip:5...@user.b.ip.here:5060>;reason=unconditional
>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>
>>> This is modified in Kamailio TOPOH and sent to FreeSwitch as following
>>>
>>>
>>> SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>> 10.0.20.71;received=10.0.20.71;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKeBcy9HKK9cDKr
>>> From: "+4319714111" <sip:+4319714111
>>> @FREESWITCH.IP.HERE>;tag=yUr5UZ7eF794K
>>> To: <sip:5...@user.b.ip.here:5060>;tag=105223296
>>> Call-ID: cd811276-4b4d-1234-66ae-005056867dbc
>>> CSeq: 87257355 INVITE
>>> Contact: <*sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP*
>>> ;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My**>
>>> User-Agent: Yealink SIP-T46G 28.80.0.70
>>> Diversion: <sip:5...@user.b.ip.here:5060>;reason=unconditional
>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>
>>>
>>> Which results in a Call Originate from FreeSwitch with RURI as this:
>>>
>>> INVITE
>>> *sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP*;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My**
>>> SIP/2.0
>>>
>>>
>>> I am thinking that in TOPOH Module some patch is required to atleast
>>> retain the $rU for 3XX replies , not sure if this will break some RFC or
>>> Kamailio stability etc !
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sammy.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Igor
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>> listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.comhttp://miconda.eu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
