Hi Alex,
Thanks for the quick response. I don't have much experience with SIP. I just
wonder if you've seen PSTN providers not send an ACK back to a re-invite? With
your professional experience, is this common? Thanks.
Regards,Jay
On Monday, August 15, 2016 5:46 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalas...@evaristesys.com> wrote:
On 08/15/2016 05:42 PM, Jay Li wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I just have a basic SIP question on re-invite. I wonder if "ACK" is
> required in a re-invite scenario, like re-invite -> 200 OK -> ACK. What
> I've seen is for some reason, my PSTN doesn't send a "ACK" back to me
> after my 200 OK response to their re-invite. I don't know if not sending
> an ACK in a re-invite is an allowed behavior. Thanks.
Yes, an ACK is required. Per RFC 3261 § 14.1 ("UAC behavior"):
The rules for transmitting a re-INVITE and for
generating an ACK for a 2xx response to re-INVITE are
the same as for the initial INVITE (Section 13.2.1).
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700
Atlanta, GA 30309
United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
