Hi, I have pasted the entire log here for your ref. http://paste.fedoraproject.org/449906/14764350/
thanks Ganesh Kumar On 10/14/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > the initial INVITE must be without a to-tag, so that's fine... > > I will try to see the reason for the t_load_contacts(). > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 14/10/16 10:31, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I referred to the totag. Sorry if I mistook it for to field. >> >> regards >> Ganesh Kumar >> >> On 10/14/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> On 14/10/16 10:25, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 10/13/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Can you split the IF with t_load_contacts () || t_next_contacts () in >>>>> two >>>>> to see which one fails? >>>> After splitting, I get this error. >>>> >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: >>>> siputils [checks.c:97]: has_totag(): no totag >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>>> [t_lookup.c:1011]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global >>>> id=1 T start=(nil) >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>>> [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >>>> searching: hash=9175, isACK=0 >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>>> [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching >>>> failed >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>>> [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no >>>> transaction found >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>>> [t_lookup.c:1080]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global >>>> id=2 T end=(nil) >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: >>>> registrar [lookup.c:240]: lookup_helper(): contact for [balaji] found >>>> by address >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: >>>> <core> [parser/parse_rr.c:453]: get_path_dst_uri(): path for branch: >>>> '<sip:10.1.0.4;lr>' >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>>> [t_serial.c:455]: t_next_contacts(): no contacts in contacts_avp - we >>>> are done! >>>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: ERROR: >>>> <script>: t_next_contacts() failed >>>> >>>> The other one doesn't fail. And also, as the logs say, the "to" field >>>> is also empty in the SIP requests. Any idea what went wrong? >>>> >>> Which message says that to field is empty? Or do you refer to the >>> to-tag? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - >>> http://www.asipto.com >>> >>> >> > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com > > -- --- http://www.infinicalls.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
