Hi, about your questions: Q1: yes it's feasible as long as the two Registrars (Kamailio) have the location information. Please see my reply on a thread on this topic: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2016-February/091612.html
Q2: given that TSILO depends on the users' location you have to put it in the Registrar. Best regards, Federico On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:32 AM, C. J Hsu (徐熙杰) <cj....@quantatw.com> wrote: > hi Federico > > i'm stuck at TSILO and wondering if you could give me some advises. > > Q1: > > in lab1, I'm having two Kamailios with proxy and registrar together, UA1 > and UA2. > UAs go thru hardware load-balancing device (F5) to register themselves in > Kamailio, > > I wonder, UA1 calling to UA2, invite suspended in Kamailio 1, waiting for > UA2; > and when UA2 come to register in Kamailio 2, TSILO in Kamailio 1 resumes > the invite and sending it to Kamailio 2, is this a no problem scenario? > > Q2: > > if we decide to separate Proxy and Registrar in different Kamailio, when > should I put TSILO in? > > > RGDS > > C J >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
