Hello, if you run with debug=3, isn't there any hint in the logs from tm module why the cancel is not matched to an invite?
If you want us to investigate, send the logs with debug=3 and pcap with the sip messages for the failure case. Cheers, Daniel On 09.04.17 01:56, Colin Morelli wrote: > Hey all, > > Trying to debug an issue with canceling an invite. I have two > different types of clients. On one client, canceling an invite works > correctly. With the other client, it t_check_trans fails. > > Both clients show the same request/responses: > > On Client A: > -> INVITE > <- 183 > -> PRACK > <- 200 > -> UPDATE (from successful STUN binding) > <- 200 > -> CANCEL > <- 200 > > On Client B: > -> INVITE > <- 183 > -> PRACK > <- 200 > -> UPDATE (from successful STUN binding) > <- 200 > -> CANCEL > <- 481 (this is sent from my kamailio script when t_check_trans fails) > > I can't see much that's different between the leading > requests/responses of each. They seem to be virtually identical (with > the exception of IP addresses and tag values, of course). This makes > sense, since they're both based on PJSIP (albeit different versions of > PJSIP, but not off by much) > > Is there anything in particular I should be looking out for that might > be obvious? I could provide more detailed logs and traces if required. > > Best, > Colin > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
