On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 9:04 AM Bradley Lucier <luc...@purdue.edu> wrote:
> Because this change introduces fixes for at least one generator > (make-ball-generator), and tests that fail with the old generator, it > might be worth an errata note. > I see your point, but errata are only for changes to the document, i.e. the specification. Changes to the sample implementation and tests go unremarked except in the Git history and the mailing list.
