I've just published draft #3 of SRFI 237 <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-237/>. It was submitted by Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, author of the SRFI.
Here are Marc's comments on the draft: The define-record-name definition has been added. It brings the syntactical layer on par with the procedural layer regarding more than one constructor per record type. Here is the commit summary: - Drop empty srfi-213. - Fix: see-also links added to the wrong SRFI. - Add "srfi-213/" back with a "README.org". - Fix typo. - Remove submodule. - Add submodule. - Fix first example. - WIP: Secondary define-record-type definitions. - Implement shadow define-record-type definitions. - Introduce define-record-name. - Change syntax of define-record-name so that defined name comes first. - Add code for dictionary example. - Add documentation for define-record-name. - Remove old code artefacts. - Record name as syntax. - Fix link to personal repo. - Fix second link as well. - Publish third draft. Here's the diff: https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-237/compare/draft-2..draft-3 Regards, SRFI Editor
