It is planned to finalize SRFI 248 soon. As it needs system support to be implemented, I am hoping for feedback from implementers. If you have any questions or are wondering about potential issues, please let me know.
That said, I am also grateful for feedback from users. Please also take a look at the added "empty-continuation?" predicate. This SRFI should be a viable option to be added to a future Scheme standard, making delimited continuations finally available to Scheme programmers. Thank you! Marc Am Sa., 7. Sept. 2024 um 19:08 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler < [email protected]>: > I've just published draft #2 of SRFI 248 > <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-248/>. It was submitted by Marc > Nieper-Wißkirchen, author of the SRFI. > > Here is the commit summary: > > - Point out resources found in SRFI 226 > - Fixes suggested by Wolfgang > - Improved formatting of guard forms > - Add empty-continuation? predicate > - Include example for empty-continuation? > - Publish third draft. > > Here's the diff: > > > https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-248/compare/draft-2..draft-3 > > Regards, > > SRFI Editor >
