I do think that the srfi 251 semantic is more consistent with the Scheme spirit, in the sense of the definitions being "simultaneous".
In fact, I was very surprised to see 245 being proposed. On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 17:54, Daphne Preston-Kendal <d...@nonceword.org> wrote: > > On 2 Dec 2023, at 02:54, Per Bothner <p...@bothner.com> wrote: > > > Also consider: > > > > (let ((x 10)) > > (display "the result is: ") > > (display x) > > (define x 42)) > > (newline)) > > > > I believe the result here should be undefined - but *not* 10. > > Indeed, this is An Error in SRFI 245. > > > Daphne > -- Yours sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin (Sent from GMail web interface.)
