Re: Problems technical and procedural

[Sergei Egorov]

What if we explicitly mark situations where there is an identifier that would refer to an outside scope in SRFI-251 semantics while referring to "over-the-run-of-commands" definition according to SRFI-245 semantics, and only those situations, as "it is an error"? Would it still leave enough useful programs "in the clear"? If this is so, both SRFIs become different implementation strategies for the same common idea. Am Sa., 2. Dez. 2023 um 23:16 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <co...@ccil.org>: On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 12:02 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nie...@gmail.com> wrote:   One may draw the conclusion that neither SRFI 245 nor SRFI 251 are ready for standardization if there is such a fundamental disagreement in the community. That is indeed the conclusion that I draw.