On 26 Sep 2024, at 20:39, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, now I understand the confusion. I am using a "weak pair" in the sense of > Chez, where the value is retained even if the key is broken. In any case, > this is an example of a mutable data structure where it would be inefficient > to wrap each weak box. Ah! I would suggest that since this is an efficiency matter only, weak pairs of this kind would belong in the Batteries. We can think about them later. Daphne
