Maybe I don't understand the semantics of your ephemeron-case form. Reading your first post, there does not seem to be a reference barrier on the key in the broken path. Can you give a syntax-case definition of ephemeron case?
Am So., 3. Aug. 2025 um 11:38 Uhr schrieb Daphne Preston-Kendal <d...@nonceword.org>: > > > Am So., 16. März 2025 um 14:19 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen > > <marc.nie...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> I just noticed that I missed sending the following post to the mailing > >> list. > >> > >> @Daphne: Does it answer your questions about how to use SRFI 254 and why > >> the proposed `ephemeron-case` would be useless? > >> > >> Marc > > > I don’t understand how this code demonstrates that ephemeron-case isn’t > needed – it could be reformulated in terms of it – but I also don’t think > that finalization should be held up by my lack of understanding :-) > > If ephemeron-case is useful, we can continue arguing about it > post-finalization and add it to R7-large without a SRFI. It is syntactic > sugar, after all. > > > Daphne > >
