Thank you for your encouragement! I am currently talking to Matthew Flatt about getting the change upstream. If this happens before SRFI 260 is finalised, we may just have to include a link to Chez Scheme.
A patch file in the SRFI repo would soon only apply only to a very dated version of Chez Scheme, so I wonder whether this would be of much help. Am Fr., 31. Jan. 2025 um 17:15 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler <s...@speechcode.com>: > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 2:49 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen > <marc.nie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I implemented generated symbols natively in Chez Scheme. The native >> implementation generates the unique names lazily. > > > Excellent. We should include this as a supplement to the sample > implementation. We could include a link to the diff in your repo, but that > would require keeping your repo up indefinitely. We could include a patch > file in the SRFI repo instead. If your change is upstreamed, we could then > point to the Chez implementation. > > What do you think? > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 2:49 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen > <marc.nie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I implemented generated symbols natively in Chez Scheme. The native >> implementation generates the unique names lazily. >> >> You can find the patched Chez Scheme here: >> >> https://github.com/mnieper/ChezScheme/tree/srfi-260 >> >> The procedure `generate-symbol` is exported by the `(chezscheme)` >> library (also known as `(scheme)`). >> >> Marc
