srfi-264  

Messages by Thread

• Last call for comments on SRFI 264: String Syntax for Scheme Regular Expressions Arthur A. Gleckler
• SRFI 264 should not be tagged ‘Pattern Matching’ Daphne Preston-Kendal
  • Re: SRFI 264 should not be tagged ‘Pattern Matching’ Arthur A. Gleckler
• New draft (#3) of SRFI 264: String Syntax for Scheme Regular Expressions Arthur A. Gleckler
• New draft (#2) of SRFI 264: String Syntax for Scheme Regular Expressions Arthur A. Gleckler
• initial comments Alex Shinn
  • Re: initial comments Sergei Egorov
  • Re: initial comments Alex Shinn
• String vs Hash Syntax? Jakub T. Jankiewicz
  • Re: String vs Hash Syntax? Sergei Egorov
  • Re: String vs Hash Syntax? Alex Shinn
  • Re: String vs Hash Syntax? Sergei Egorov
  • Re: String vs Hash Syntax? Sergei Egorov
• SRFI 264: String Syntax for Scheme Regular Expressions Arthur A. Gleckler