Taylor R. Campbell scripsit: > String-set! returns a string whose elements the same (in the > sense of eqv?) as those in STRING, with the exception of element > K, which is instead the same as CHAR. String-set! may or may > not return a string which is the same as STRING, but must not > side-effect STRING. > > (I think you probably meant to strike the exclamation mark from the > name.)
Yes. Alternatively, the ! could be kept in the sense of SRFI-1, and then the "must not" would be changed to "may or may not". This would provide immutable strings as an implementation option. -- Mos Eisley spaceport. You will never John Cowan see a more wretched hive of scum and [EMAIL PROTECTED] villainy -- unless you watch the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Jerry Springer Show. --georgettesworld.com
