On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 09:22:53PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 9:51 AM -0800 2/24/99, Jose Muniz wrote:
> >Holger Trapp wrote:
> >> the percentage value reported by scp 1.2.26 as part of the statistics
> >> display is incorrectly calculated when transferring large files (650
> >> MB in my case) from a remote server to the local machine.
>
> > Well, let me out it this way, is not that is old news but
> > rather a very old version of SSH. Well I do not remember
> > seeing 1.2.27 however I have seen 1.3.6 and 2.0.12.
> > Well, we really appreciate your comments, and really
> > recommend you to get a newer version of SSH.
>
> Since 1.2.26 is a "very old version", perhaps you could point
> us at version 1.3.6 (which I assume is related to 1.2.26).
> For my purposes, 2.0.12 isn't quite appropriate.
>
> I have been preoccupied with other matters for the past month
> or so, but I would also mention that I've never seen any
> announcement for any 1.3.* version. Interesting that it's
> apparently already up to 1.3.6.
I had always supposed that the times I had seen 1.3.* refered to that it
was someone's typo which had propogated through other postings. Is there
really such an animal as SSH 1.3.* ?
Chris
--
Christopher Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | All opinions are my own,
System Administrator | and do not represent the
Center for Experimental Computation | opinions or viewpoints
Michigan Technological University | of my employer.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"History may not repeat itself, but it does tend to rhyme." -- Mark Twain
