Sorry it took me so long to respond. Please refer to "(5) use at home or
while traveling for work for which You will be paid;"
Some Administrator would need to have access to certain Servers from home,
and yes they do get paid a yearly salary. This is necessary as checking of
logs, etc. is a part of their job. Perhaps I'm misinterpreting the
wording, but if that is the case then there must be other people that do as
well and it should be changed. Anyhow below is the URL to which you can
refer for further clarification.
http://www.ssh.com/products/ssh/ssh_license_agreement.html
Thanks for your response.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sami Lehtinen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 8:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: FW: ssh-1.2.28
asosin, on July 4. 2000, wrote:
: One of the reasons we have not installed SSH2 at the 'U of T' is
because
: of the restrictions which were placed on that particular version. We
: didn't have a chance to look at SSH-1.2.28 but if the terms are similar
to
: the license terms in SSH2, then most likely Universities will not use
your
: software. I too agree that if there is a new addition to this legal
: license, it would be a good idea to let us know about this sort of
thing.
:
: Can someone confirm that Universities are still able to use SSH1.2.28 -
: legally ?
Yes, like universities are able to use ssh-2.2.x legally.
--
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Sami J. Lehtinen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[work:+358 9 85657425][gsm:+358 50 5170 258][http://www.iki.fi/~sjl]
[SSH Communications Security Corp http://www.ssh.com/]
