Well Walt, intrigued by your question I looked up the respective chemicals in 
a '67 ed. of the Chemical Rubber Company ( Cleveland, Ohio - which - the 
company I mean - is I guess just a rust-belt memory by now ) 'Handbook of 
Chemistry & Physics'.
There is naturally no mention of BThus.but it gives heat of combustion in 
cals/gram MWt as follows
Ethanol     327.6
Methanol   170.9
which is what you would expect I guess from the former having more Cs & Hs.

Outweighing this however, will probably be the fact that methanol is more 
volatile than ethanol so it probably 'gets thar fustest with the mostest' cf. 
propane/butane. Didn't they stick meths into the old piston engines to liven 
them up ?

In the UK 'meths' is 'eths' deliberately contaminated with some 'meths' , 
other nasties & coloured ( the additions giving it it the stink on burning ) 
to make it undrinkable so the government can go on extracting large sums of 
duty from us. 
All these things take in water from the atmos. & of course are all produced 
in the cheapest way poss. which explains differences in performance between 
different brands.  

Art 
      -a Brit not clever enough to have moved to a cabin in the Californian 
woods like Spenceley. 

Reply via email to