This seems to have been bounced so I'm re-sending Art ----- Original Message ----- From: "mart.towers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 8:05 PM Subject: Re: Photo depth and plume/digihassles
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Multiple recipients of sslivesteam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 7:42 PM > Subject: Re: Photo depth and plume > > > > At 10:30 AM -0700 5/10/04, Gary wrote: > > >Film can capture moving images better than my > > >digital camera. > > > > that is somewhat a function of the settings that are available in the > > camera ... you want to go to the place where you can change the "iso" > > (it was called asa when i started taking pictures) and crank it up to > > 1600. > > Trouble is this - with film cameras you stick in a film with a higher > ISO/ASA to capture movement, 'tho generally 200/400 was enough to arrest our > small steamers - ie the chemists at Kodak/Fuji did the work. > I suspect with the 'consumer' level digicams, eg my Fuji 6800, whatever > setting you fiddle, they can only freeze movement by collecting less info & > the pic looks 'grainy'. > > Not that I really know what I'm talking about but that seems to be the > effect! > > Art Walker >
