On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:01:39PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 13:24 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > Except some rare cases out use of tevent_req_is_error() was dangerous. > > Almost everywhere where we used it it was probably ok, but given the > > semantics of that function I think using the macro in this patch is much > > safer. > > Bad patch, > attached a new one that actually compiles ... > > Simo. >
Patch does not apply, please rebase. It looks ok by visual inspection but I would like to run some 'real' tests. Will you try to fix this issue upstream ? bye, Sumit _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
