-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/12/2010 03:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 03/12/2010 02:58 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> On 03/12/2010 02:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: >>> On a second thought I guess we can do both, complain and yet still try >>> to play nice if some admin insist on using nscd with sssd. > >> After a discussion off-list, attached is another patch with the >> following changes: > >> * the flush itself was moved into the sss_sync_ops module with no error >> checking whatsoever, failing is just a noop now >> * there is a new configure switch --without-nscd to explicitly turn off >> calling out to nscd even if it is available on the system >> * the monitor now check for nscd socket on startup and issues a loud >> warning that sssd is not supposed to be used in parallel with nscd. > > Ack. >
Pushed to master and 1-1-0 - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkueHRAACgkQeiVVYja6o6NuTACeLk76B1U/J9QkW/5vAWwlb29I qEAAoJZeA4P8i+4B/Tb71IEsVoGrNK1G =xhY9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
