On 05/07/2010 05:03 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > As for this particular set of changes, I'm still going to resolve this > particular issue in the way that Dmitri suggests for 1.2.0. That's > because this is a segfault and needs to be eliminated before we can ship > 1.2.0 (the preview tarball of which is targeted to be released today). > So please understand that this is not me ignoring your patches, just me > opting to make a less-disruptive change at the end of a dev cycle. (And > also taking your advice about reducing code duplication) > > > I understand the situation and agree that a spot fix is the only option for SSSD 1.2. I have already expressed this opinion before. I just wondered how discovery of this nice booby traps in LDAP provider code might affect your release schedule.
Eugene Indenbom _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
