On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/02/2010 10:37 AM, Jeff Schroeder wrote: >> >> Actually, I am using: rpm-4.6.1-3.fc10. It properly added a dep on >> libsemanage.so.6, but I thought a new dependency should be explicit vs >> implicit sort of like the zen of python. Perhaps I was wrong in >> thinking this but it is a bit annoying to not see a dep like that when >> staring at the spec file. No worries either way as this patch is very >> trivial. >> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
Ah. Well in that case, I rescind the original patch unless you think it will be necessary for RHEL or some older version of rpm. -- Jeff Schroeder Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix. http://www.digitalprognosis.com _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
