On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 17:45 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > > On 07/05/2011 09:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 15:14 +0100, Pierre Carrier wrote: > > >> Hello Stephen, > > >> > > >> On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:54, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > >>> It would make much more sense to implement a new policy type and handle > > >>> this there. > > >> > > >> Agreed. We could then cleanly implement the policies defined in > > >> [MS-ADTS]. > > >> > > >> Hopefully I'll get a test env up and running soon to work on that. > > >> > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > > > > > Hello Pierre, > > > > > > This discussion fell off my radar, but I wanted to follow up and see > > > > > > if you had done any further work on finishing up this patch. Anything we > > > can do to help? > > > > As far as I know Pierre left Red Hat, so I doubt he will be finishing > > the patch. > > Stephen, > I took the original patch and I made changes you requested along with some > fixes you missed. Please take a look if the patch needs anything else. > > Thanks > Jan
Nack. The idea was not to use ldap_pwd_policy=shadow but to add a new ldap_pwd_policy=ad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
