On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 23:21 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote: > Hi again, > I was trying to play with a test configuration of my sssd and I think > I found a discrepancy among documentation and implementation. In > doubt, I ask before :-) > > This is the last part of my sssd startup output: > > (Mon Feb 6 23:04:52:002347 2012) [sssd] [confdb_get_domain_internal] > (0x0010): Local ID provider does not support [permit] as an ACCESS > provider. > (Mon Feb 6 23:04:52:002823 2012) [sssd] [confdb_get_domains] > (0x0010): Error (22 [Invalid argument]) retrieving domain [my_local], > skipping! >
Please file a bug at https://fedorahosted.org/sssd This should be acceptable (in fact the 'permit' access provider is the only one that works right now. We have a bad check there. For the record, if you delete the access_provider line from your config, it will work properly as if you set 'permit' (because that is the default).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
