On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 13:47 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:55:08AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > Attached are 25 patches that are a second wave on top of my previous > > refactoring patchset for #1747. > > > > These new patches are a start for the removal of the sysdb argument from > > some of the functions, leaving just the domain argument. This part is > > not complete, but this subset is self contained. > > > > On top of that there is also a complete refactoring of the code around > > the struct be_req structure. This structure has now been made private to > > the data_provider_be.c file so that it cannot be abused in future. > > > > I will soon propose a third wave with more sysdb args elimination and > > hopefully, finally a change in how subdomains are managed, which is the > > end-goal of this long refactoring journey. > > > > This patchset is also compressed as uncompresse dit amounts to ~ 250k > > Hi Simo, I was only able to apply the first 10 patches, can you rebase > (publishing just the git branch is OK). > > I read the first 10 patches I could apply and they look good to me. I > don't really have any issues and I give a tentative ack. > > I ran some limited tests and didn't find any issues either, but I'd like > to do full testing with the whole patchset.
I pushed a rebase sysdb_refactor tree with 2nd and third wave patches on top of master. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
