On Thursday 2014-01-09 14:42, Simo Sorce wrote: > >Sorry, but in my book changing the SONAME for a backwards compatible >change is not ok [...] I do, maintaining a stable SONAME is >important [...] The only solution for backwards compatible changes >that require a new symbol with the same soname is to have an >explicit version dependency in the package management system. That >can be enforced only at build time.
Hey, keeping SONAME and doing symbol version maps was my preferential pick as well, but Lukas Slebodnik did not want to. Come on, is it really _so much_ work to maintain a symbol version file? How many symbols get added anyway? Just give me a clear answer already. Will sssd address the issue, or is it going to be a "fuck you" to downstream packagers? _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
