On 03/10/2014 06:14 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 03:02:30PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Fair enough. I saw both complaints from potential consumers -- some
developers were going "omg dbus is such a heavyweight desktop technology,
do I really need to use it" ? I realize 'hiding' dbus behind a different
name might be a little irrational, but so were their concerns in my
opinion.
I think as long as well call it the D-Bus responder we should keep dbus
in the names. Otherwise we might get questions like 'How do I start the
InfoPipe responder?'.
It is actually already confusing. We never use anything else than D-Bus
responder, but the responder itself in Jakub's branch is called ifp.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
