On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 06:13:53PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:22:04PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I noticed these two warnings in clang. > > > > It would be great if the 2nd patch could be checked by Sumit to make > > sure that the return value wasn't ignored on purpose. > > yes, I would prefer to ignore errors here. There might be various cases > were we are not able to resolve a single SID but still can proceed with > the others. > > The first patch looks good, I'll run some tests and will give my results > later.
ACK to the first patch. bye, Sumit > > bye, > Sumit > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Pavel Reichl > > > _______________________________________________ > sssd-devel mailing list > sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
