On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:47:18AM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > Pros of libini > - already working and stable parser for INI files > - already integrated with SSSD and GSS proxy > - has advanced convenience features > - can be turn around and delivered very fast because of control > > Cons of libini > - zero community > - INI files only > - main developer does not have time to work on it
Can it modify the ini files? Does it have bindings from scripting languages? > Pros of augeas > - has parser > - has community > - contributing to it will have general benefit It can modify the ini files. > Cons of augeas > - not integrated into SSSD and GSS proxy > - does not have advanced features (to be verified) > - less control and thus slower turn around It's probably bigger code than smaller-purpose library. -- Jan Pazdziora | adelton at #ipa*, #brno Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
