On 06/12/2014 03:49 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/06/14 14:03), Pavel Březina wrote:
On 06/06/2014 02:29 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/05/14 17:50), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/05/14 17:47), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
In theory, it could be possible to build current master without samba
on rhel5, but the spec file would be very complicated.
It is better to simplify spec file.
Patch is attached.
1 file changed, 43 deletions(-) :-)
LS
The patch lost somewhere.
One more time
LS
I found out there is already similar ticket.
Attached patch also get rid of Fedora 17 and older conditionals
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) :-)
LS
PS: With recent patches[1][2][3][4], it is possible to build sssd on rhel5.
(without samba and without python bindings). The spec file would be very
complicated. I have a modified spec in my private branch. If we want we can
have spec file for epel5 in contrib directory.
[1] b3007e32fa5d6b722f3aaaf9fe7593103cb443c3
[2] 1ecb16023779f912ba1c4e9e418acb59296ce8bc
[3] 18647db9e275e7aa3e002551237abae756a2afb9
[4] a2e417f38c57ed87c956ddcecf4dafca93842b65
What a nice spec file it is! :)
I have just one question, this diff actually seems to add a condition intead
of remove it:
BuildRequires: glib2-devel
BuildRequires: selinux-policy-targeted
-%if (0%{?fedora} >= 18)
+%if 0%{?fedora}
BuildRequires: libcmocka-devel
+%endif
+%if (0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >= 7)
BuildRequires: libnl3-devel
%else
BuildRequires: libnl-devel
@@ -139,10 +115,7 @@ BuildRequires: systemd-devel
BuildRequires: cifs-utils-devel
%endif
Can you move it to a separate commit?
Sure,
new version is attached.
LS
Hi,
I'm sorry for the delay, the patch does no longer apply. Can you rebase
it please?
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
