On (25/06/15 15:41), Michal Židek wrote: >On 06/23/2015 08:23 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:00:27PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>>On (17/06/15 20:44), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>>>On (17/06/15 15:32), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>>>>ehlo, >>>>> >>>>>I was able to reproduce failed build in covergae phase on local machine. >>>>> >>>>>It seems that gcc did some optimization and >>>>>used execve instead of execle when the code was >>>>>instrumented for coverage analysis. >>>>> >>>>>So the exec* function was not wrapped and it tried to call >>>>>real binary ipa-getkeytab. Obviously it failed. >>>>> >>>>>LS >>>> >>>>>From 727d2dae8b65697269bd2e43adeb06500d65ac11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>>From: Lukas Slebodnik <lsleb...@redhat.com> >>>>>Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:29:09 +0200 >>>>>Subject: [PATCH] test_ipa_subdomains_server: Fix build with --coverage >>>>> >>>>>It seems that gcc did some optimization and >>>>>used execve instead of execle when the code was >>>>>instrumented for coverage analysis. >>>>> >>>>>So the exec* function was not wrapped and it tried to call >>>>>real binary ipa-getkeytab >>>> >>>>It still fails on rhel6 >>>> >>>A crash/fail in rehl6 is unrelated to my patch. >>>make check will fail on different place. >>> >>>So this patch can be revied and if somebody have free cycles >>>he can look into the new problem on rhel6. >> >>I don't therefore we need a ticket I guess, otherwise we can't push >>Nikolai's patch. > >Lukas's patch fixes the issue on fedora rawhide and debian testing. >The code looks good and harmless (just added one wrapper). > >We have ticket to track the issue on rhel6 which has different root >cause. Just for record. here is a ticket to different issue on rhel6 https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2693
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel