On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 05:52:20PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote: > On 10/07/15 16:55, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 01:17:44PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote: > >>While reading #2558 I noticed that there is a further request relating to > >>these patches - mbasti asks If there could be some mean how to send IPs of > >>all interfaces? > >>Is this a good idea in general? > >>I suppose I could implement it with some special value for 'dyndns_iface' - > >>ideally the special value would contain characters prohibited to be part of > >>interface name if there are such... > >I would say this looks like a useful feature in general, but can you ask > >Martin why he needs this feature? I think the time has come for 1.13 > >development to start turning into bug fixing more, so unless there is > >really some particular use-case, please move the ticket into 1.14. > >_______________________________________________ > >sssd-devel mailing list > >sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > >https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel > This is blocker for https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4249 > > Without this patch we cannot add dualstack and multihomed support to IPA > clients, because when IPA adds all IP and IPv6 addresses to DNS, then SSSD > just deletes all records and put there just one address.
I can see the argument for dualstack -- we shouldn't remove v6 addresses if we're talking to the server over v4 and conversely. I suspect the multi-homed use-case is a bit less important, right? > > We want to support dualstack in IPA for long time. Several users wanted > dualstack, even multihomed support. Is there a corresponding IPA ticket or some link to a freeipa-users thread? Please note I agree with the technical requirement, but there's limited time, so we should prioritize. _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel