On (12/10/15 11:55), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: >On 10/12/2015 11:52 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>On (12/10/15 11:41), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: >>>Hi everyone, >>> >>>Attached is a patch which tries to workaround a DNF bug [1] which prevents us >>>from running CI on Fedora Rawhide. >>> >>>It seems to work, however Fedora Rawhide repos seem to have some other issue >>>at the moment, which manifests in dependency installation failures [2], >>>including standalone builds of SSSD. >>> >>>Nick >>> >>>[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269665 >>>[2] >>>http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/30/10/fedora_rawhide/ci-build-debug/ci-mock-build.log >> >>>From a5efaa7c010c472cb31c0028dd6166a5d8e04d2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>From: Nikolai Kondrashov <[email protected]> >>>Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:48:38 +0300 >>>Subject: [PATCH] CI: Run mock under PTY to workaround DNF bug >>> >>>Run mock on a pseudo-TTY with the help of "unbuffer" from the "expect" >>>package to workaround a bug in DNF. >>>--- >>I would prefer till dnf is fixed and do not add workarounds. > >Weell, I don't believe it will be fixed soon, but if we're OK with that, no >problem. > >>BTW the problem with using yum in mock for fedora >= 23 >>should be fixed within a days. >>There is already bugfix in upstream >>http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git;a=commitdiff;h=9c082fb8689efdaa5a595d3043e67ccec4ed930c > >Ah, good. But then, wouldn't we need to add a workaround to ask mock to run >yum instead of dnf? > We alredy has non-default mock configuration files due to tmpfs. So it would be just a temporary change on server side. BTW yum is used for installation of chroot for fedora <=23. So it would not be huge change.
And maybe dnf bug would be fixed by updated rpm :-) LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
