On (02/03/16 13:45), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>On 03/02/2016 01:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (02/03/16 13:02), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>>On 03/02/2016 12:53 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>On (02/03/16 12:48), Pavel Březina wrote:
>>>>>On 03/01/2016 03:54 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>>>>>I added one more similar patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>sss_idmap_calculate_range can accept domain SID or range identifier on
>>>>>>its input. Previous parameter name was misleading.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ack to both. They can sure be squashed before pushing but I don't care.
>>>>I miss a link here.
>>>>
>>>>Anyway I would like to see a Sumit opinin about renaming variables.
>>>>Because name of variables is one of hard things problems in IT
>>>>http://martinfowler.com/bliki/TwoHardThings.html
>>>
>>>Might we could do an all hands meeting,
>>>because we really don't want to underestimate such important change.
>>>
>>If the patch is not important then it does not make a sense to push it.
>>
>>BTW You introduced one of bad argument names in the recent
>>commit 8babbeee01e67893af4828ddfc922ecac0be4197
>
>Sure, I did that and now I see that it would be nice to use a different name.
>
Sumit is fine with changes.
Would you be so kind and could you send squased patch which
we can push.

LS
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to