> On Apr 7, 2016, at 3:27 AM, Lukas Slebodnik <lsleb...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On (06/04/16 15:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:16:20PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:39:39AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> On Apr 6, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:34:33PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>>>>> We only need to go online if we receive a netlink signal that might >>>>>> indicate that the external connection might have become available. This >>>>>> will never be true for link-local addresses. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The indentation of DEBUG messages is a bit off on two of places. I fixed >>>>> them locally, if you agree, I would like to push: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/jhrozek/sssd/commit/818eada2a68b6c9cff9eb3285ff6126ba4032e31 >>>>> >>>>> (Just the intentation changed, nothing else..) >>>> >>>> >>>> Fine by me. >>> >>> OK, ACK >>> >>> Thank you for the patch and the investigation! >> >> CI: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/40/75/summary.html >> >> btw I tested by bringing up and down the loopback interface and making >> sure that addresses like ::1 are filtered out. >> >> * master: a9d1b4b61b614a954c784f224b8fe7a47b6dd206 > Stephen, > > I think you would like to have this patch in fedora 24 :-) > I can backport this patch just to fedora if you file a BZ > or we can backport this patch to 1.13 branch > and it will be in fedora with next release (1.13.4) > which should be next week. > > What do you prefer? > > LS
Next week is fine. I'm carrying the patch locally on my machine and I haven't heard any other complaints. _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
