On 06/20/2016 05:48 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:15:20AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> BTW we can add Requires/Recommends into pacakge sssd-ad for this sub-pacakge. >> So it will be installed by default. > > I think this is not needed. It is only needed for samba, not on an > general AD client. And even with samba people might want to select > between the idmap plugin and SSSD's libwbclient implementation. >
What is the advantage of one over the other? This seems to me like one of those situations where we have two solutions that people aren't realistically going to know which to pick. In that case, we should probably consider using dependencies to select the preferred one if neither is currently present. We can do this by having both packages add a virtual `Provides: sssd-samba-id-mapping` and have sssd-ad add Recommends: sssd-samba-id-mapping Suggests: sssd-libwbclient (or Suggests: sssd-winbind-idmap whichever one is more feature-complete) What this will do is pull in the Suggests dependency unless the other one was specified manually (or already exists on the system) to satisfy the virtual Provides.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
