On 08.07.2016 11:33, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > Hi, > > our upstream front page still lists 1.9 as LTM, which is maybe true > technically, because we haven't proclaimed any other release as LTM, but > 1.9 is also very old and upstream we really just tell users to upgrade to > 1.13. > > So I think we should just name 1.13 as our LTM. We already backport all > important fixes to sssd-1-13 branch anyway. RHEL-6 is (probably) going > to stick with 1.13 for the rest of its lifetime, but I wonder if this > would play well with Suse and Ubuntu..Howard, Timo, are your long-term > maintenance distributions using 1.13 and would sticking with 1.13 for them > also make sense for you?
Hi, makes perfect sense to me as 16.04 is shipping with 1.13.4. -- t _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
