On (20/07/16 10:44), Pavel Březina wrote: >On 07/18/2016 01:28 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (07/07/16 12:59), Pavel Březina wrote: >> > On 07/05/2016 07:49 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 01:24:35PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: >> > > >> > > > From 8b877579f3d1a9bbfa728a6e78ff829d936efbb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 >> > > > 2001 >> > > > From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?= <[email protected]> >> > > > Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 13:23:57 +0200 >> > > > Subject: [PATCH] sssctl: print a message when managing sssd >> > > >> > > Shouldn't this be specific to the service manager used? systemctl is >> > > quiet so this does add additional verbosity, but init scripts printed >> > > the starting/stopping message as well, so we would print them twice. >> > > >> > > In general, I'm more in favor of tools being silent unless something >> > > goes bad. >> > >> > I think we should print something when we are doing more operations such as >> > in remove-cache we are stopping and starting SSSD so I think it may be nice >> > to tell administrator that we have actually stopped sssd but that we were >> > unable to start it. But if you think we should stay silence and just print >> > an >> > error feel free to ignore this patch or tell me if I should make it systemd >> > specific message. >> Do we have some consensus to this patch? > >Not really. I think we will drop it. OK, I makrked the patch as rejected in patchwork
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
