On (09/08/16 10:35), Pavel Březina wrote: >On 07/20/2016 11:10 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: >> CI: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/50/01/summary.html >> >> The failure is about missing dependencies, unrelated to these patches. >> >> It depends on the sssctl failover patches due to changes in attaching >> dbus message to a talloc context. Now it is possible to also free the >> message with both dbus_message_unref() and talloc_free(). Since the >> sssctl patches are already in late review process I didn't want to >> change them. > >Bump. I had a plan to test these patches but there are still some regressions in sssd and I would like to avoid introducing new ones without testing.
Do these patches block you or other patches? LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
