On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Lukas Slebodnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On (29/08/16 14:15), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Lukas Slebodnik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On (29/08/16 12:08), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>>>On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Jakub Hrozek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:38:46AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>>> On (29/08/16 07:09), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>>>>> >Hoiwdy!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>> >> This patch is a first attempt to make "make intgcheck" less
>>>>>> >> painful/time consuming than it is now.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Although the patch provides a good improvement on having 5 new
>>>>>> >> targets, I know it's still not ideal. The ideal case, IMO, would be
>>>>>> >> being able to select which subset of tests would be run, but that's an
>>>>>> >> improvement that can be done later on.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Tips are welcome.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Best Regards,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >After a few dicussions and some tests done when we met personally, I
>>>>>> >found out that the patch was broken.
>>>>>> >Taking Lukaš suggestion (almost) I've merged the -prepare and
>>>>>> >-configure parts and re-worked the way we get the prefix.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Now it seems to be working!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Best Regards,
>>>>>> >--
>>>>>> >Fabiano Fidêncio
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >From a33e1dffd063845e709f5fc1cfec93c330445ab4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>> >From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:24:17 +0200
>>>>>> >Subject: [PATCH v2] BUILD: Add a few more targets for intg tests
>>>>>> >MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>>> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>>>>> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Running "make intgcheck" has been proven to be a bit painful (mainly
>>>>>> >when the developer is just writing down a single test case), as it
>>>>>> >cleans up the build directory and fireis a new build before, finally,
>>>>>> >run the tests.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >In order to make it a little less painful, let's break the whole
>>>>>> >operation into 4 new targets:
>>>>>> >    intgcheck-{prepare,build,run,clean}.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >As expected, "make intgcheck" calls these 4 new operations in the same
>>>>>> >order they were presented, not changing then the current behavior.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Each operation will trigger the previous one in case there is no
>>>>>> >"$$prefix" directory created and the directory is _only_ created in the
>>>>>> >very first operation (intghceck-prepare).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >---
>>>>>> > Makefile.am | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>>>>> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
>>>>>> >index 30d874e..8372b92 100644
>>>>>> >--- a/Makefile.am
>>>>>> >+++ b/Makefile.am
>>>>>> >@@ -3076,30 +3076,50 @@ endif
>>>>>> > # Integration tests #
>>>>>> > #####################
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >-intgcheck:
>>>>>> >+intgcheck-prepare:
>>>>>> >     echo "temporarily disabled"
>>>>>> >     set -e; \
>>>>>> >-    rm -Rf intg; \
>>>>>> >-    $(MKDIR_P) intg/bld; \
>>>>>> >-    : Use /hopefully/ short prefix to keep D-Bus socket path short; \
>>>>>> >-    prefix=`mktemp --tmpdir --directory sssd-intg.XXXXXXXX`; \
>>>>>> >-    $(LN_S) "$$prefix" intg/pfx; \
>>>>>> >-    cd intg/bld; \
>>>>>> >+    rm -Rf intg ; \
>>>>>> >+    $(MKDIR_P) intg/bld ; \
>>>>>> >+    : Use /hopefully/ short prefix to keep D-Bus socket path short ; \
>>>>>> >+    prefix=`mktemp --tmpdir --directory sssd-intg.XXXXXXXX` ; \
>>>>>> >+    $(LN_S) "$$prefix" intg/pfx ; \
>>>>>> >+    cd intg/bld ; \
>>>>>> >     $(abs_top_srcdir)/configure \
>>>>>> >-        --prefix="$$prefix" \
>>>>>> >+        --prefix=$$prefix \
>>>>>> >         --with-ldb-lib-dir="$$prefix"/lib/ldb \
>>>>>> >         --enable-intgcheck-reqs \
>>>>>> >         --without-semanage \
>>>>>> >-        $(INTGCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS); \
>>>>>> >-    $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS); \
>>>>>> >-    : Force single-thread install to workaround concurrency issues; \
>>>>>> >-    $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -j1 install; \
>>>>>> >-    : Remove .la files from LDB module directory to avoid loader 
>>>>>> >warnings; \
>>>>>> >-    rm "$$prefix"/lib/ldb/*.la; \
>>>>>> >-    $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src/tests/intg intgcheck-installed; \
>>>>>> >-    cd ../..; \
>>>>>> >+        $(INTGCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS) ; \
>>>>>> >+    cd ../..
>>>>>> >+
>>>>>> >+intgcheck-build:
>>>>>> >+    if [ ! -d intg/pfx ]; then $(MAKE) intgcheck-prepare; fi ; \
>>>>>> >+    prefix=`readlink -e intg/pfx` ; \
>>>>>> >+    cd intg/bld ; \
>>>>>> >+    $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) ; \
>>>>>> >+    : Force single-thread install to workaround concurrency issues ; \
>>>>>> >+    $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -j1 install ; \
>>>>>> >+    : Remove .la files from LDB module directory to avoid loader 
>>>>>> >warnings ; \
>>>>>> >+    rm "$$prefix"/lib/ldb/*.la ; \
>>>>>> >+    cd ../..
>>>>>> >+
>>>>>> >+intgcheck-run:
>>>>>> >+    if [ ! -d intg/pfx ]; then $(MAKE) intgcheck-build; fi ; \
>>>>>> >+    cd intg/bld ; \
>>>>>> >+    $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src/tests/intg intgcheck-installed ; \
>>>>>> >+    cd ../..
>>>>>> >+
>>>>>> >+intgcheck-clean:
>>>>>> >+    prefix=`readlink -e intg/pfx` ; \
>>>>>> >     rm -Rf "$$prefix" intg
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >+intgcheck:
>>>>>> >+    $(MAKE) intgcheck-prepare
>>>>>> >+    $(MAKE) intgcheck-build
>>>>>> I would merge intgcheck-prepare and intgcheck-build bas well.
>>>>
>>>>Can be done. But if that's not a mandatory requirement I still think
>>>>it may be useful for someone else in the way it's split.
>>>>
>>> "prepare" and "build" it's the same for me.
>>> It is a prerequisity for
>>> <userstory>
>>>     As a developer, I need a way to run a single test without
>>>     re-compiling SSSD every time and waiting for all the tests to
>>>     finish.
>>> </userstory>
>>
>>Okay. I've merged both and kept the "-build" name.
>>
> "-build" is a little bit confusing IMHO.
> Because the target not only build sssd with custom prefix but also
> *install* sssd. So prepare might be more appropriate.
>
> Sorry for nitpicking and fell free to propose different name.

s/build/prepare done.
Please, see the attached patch.

Being completely honest here, I don't like the idea of not having a
step that builds and installs.
Let's see if someone complains in the future, then we can end up
re-adding this extra step.

Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio
From 33e66d12b39ef1c4fa6e23b38a644bdbafa6b7e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:24:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v4] BUILD: Add a few more targets for intg tests
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Running "make intgcheck" has been proven to be a bit painful (mainly
when the developer is just writing down a single test case), as it
cleans up the build directory and fireis a new build before, finally,
run the tests.

In order to make it a little less painful, let's break the whole
operation into 3 new targets:
    intgcheck-{prepare,run,clean}.

As expected, "make intgcheck" calls these 3 new operations in the same
order they were presented, not changing then the current behavior.

Each operation will trigger the previous one in case there is no
"$$prefix" directory created and the directory is _only_ created in the
very first operation (intghcheck-prepare).

A note must be done about how to run a simple test file or a simple test
from a test file when running "make intgcheck-run". The option always
been here but only makes sense now that we have the intgcheck split in a
few useful steps. See the examples below (and for more detailed
information, check the py.test documentation):
 #Run a single file
 INTGCHECK_PYTEST_ARGS="-k test_netgroup.py" make intgcheck-run
 #Run a single test from a single file
 INTGCHECK_PYTEST_ARGS="test_netgroup.py -k test_add_empty_netgroup" make intgcheck-run

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <[email protected]>
---
 Makefile.am | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 6219682..6299ac7 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -3076,7 +3076,7 @@ endif
 # Integration tests #
 #####################
 
-intgcheck:
+intgcheck-prepare:
 	echo "temporarily disabled"
 	set -e; \
 	rm -Rf intg; \
@@ -3096,10 +3096,23 @@ intgcheck:
 	$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -j1 install; \
 	: Remove .la files from LDB module directory to avoid loader warnings; \
 	rm "$$prefix"/lib/ldb/*.la; \
+	cd ../..
+
+intgcheck-run:
+	if [ ! -d intg/pfx ]; then $(MAKE) intgcheck-build; fi; \
+	cd intg/bld; \
 	$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src/tests/intg intgcheck-installed; \
-	cd ../..; \
+	cd ../..
+
+intgcheck-clean:
+	prefix=`readlink -e intg/pfx`; \
 	rm -Rf "$$prefix" intg
 
+intgcheck:
+	$(MAKE) intgcheck-prepare
+	$(MAKE) intgcheck-run
+	$(MAKE) intgcheck-clean
+
 ####################
 # Client Libraries #
 ####################
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to